A League Picks – Round 4

I finally came out of a round winning more than the $10 I bet!

My $5 on Sydney to lose and my $1 on Victory to win got me $11.85 which mean my ledger opens this week at -$12.45

I still have a long way to go…

So this weeks bets…

Wanderers v Adelaide


Western Sydney haven’t started the season as well as the ladder might suggest. The only team they’ve actually beaten is the Frank Farina’d Sydney FC – which is about as difficult as convincing Craig Foster to write another awful article with an unnecessary reference to Barcelona in it. On the other hand Adelaide are a work in progress who can look great one minute and terrible the next. I’m not confident of anything here so I’ll put $1 on a draw (at $4.00)

Sydney v Perth


Sydney are an awful, awful football team right now. That’s all I can say without going on an expletive laden rant about Anthony Crea’s complete lack of understanding of how the human body works. Betting against Sydney at the moment is just free money so I’m going all out and putting $6 on Perth to win (at $1.85)

Newcastle v Mariners


We’ve had the sellout Melbourne and Sydney derbies so far this season, and next up we have the world renowned F3 derby. I hear that the hill will be packed for this one. It will be a shame when the Jets do their footballing impression of Thursday FC and try to bore everyone into a coma. I’m putting my dollar here on The Mariners to win by 2 or more goals (at $3.15)

Roar v Heart


Melbourne Heart have comfortably taken up their spot near the foot of the totem pole as the 3rd worst team in the competition and given how poorly they play away from home, combined with Brisbane’s form so far this season, there’s only one way this can go. But the TAB seems to know this as well and the odds are too short to bother with a straight win, so in an effort to get some bang for my literal buck, I’m putting my dollar here on Brisbane to win 2-0 (at $6.00)

Victory v Phoenix


This one is a bit of a mystery. How will the Victory react to losing Ange? How will Merrick feel coaching against the club where he made his name? Could footballing thug Kevin Muscat look any more like an orc? All pressing questions but without the answers, this is a toss up. I’ll just play it safe and put my dollar on Melbourne to win (at $1.55)

Ledger sits at -$22.45

Gamble Responsibly

A League Picks – Round 3

It was all going so well.

Until just before full time in the Mariners v Melbourne Heart game on Saturday evening, I was on a winning run.

Then the rest of the weekend happened.

I won $3.40 from the Adelaide draw, and lost all four other bets, leaving my account at $-14.30 after just 2 weeks. Somebody stop me!

At least this week my bets were close, but close doesn’t win you any money.

So on to this weeks tips

Victory v Brisbane


Who knows what will happen here? These two sides have had Jeckyll and Hyde performances so far this season and when you add in Melbourne losing their coach, this game could go any way. I’m going to have my insurance bet on this game with a dollar on Melbourne to win at home (at $2.60) and a dollar on a draw (at $3.40)

Mariners v Adelaide


United are currently sitting in second position on the ladder, but the reality is that last weeks 2-2 draw should have been a 3-1 loss. On top of that, the Mariners will be smarting that they haven’t won a game yet this season (in fact, none of last season’s top 3 teams have won a game so far this year. Haven’t lost one either though). The Mariners work better out of the spotlight, and the smaller home crowd this week should work to their advantage. I’m going to have a dollar on Central Coast to win 2-1 (at $8.00)

Sydney v Wanderers


The big game of the week will see a sellout crowd watch last rounds whipping boys (who are somehow still in 3rd spot!) go up against the competitions media darlings, and the darlings are well overdue for a win. Currently on a run of 3 competitive matches without a win, the Wanderers will be desperate to take home the full three points from the derby match as questions begin to be asked of their ability to perform under pressure. Sydney supporters will say that the Sky Blues’ home performances have been almost inexplicably good under Frank Farina, but the one team to win at the SFS since he took over is Western Sydney. So in classic gamblers form, I’m having a bit bet on this to try and save myself from circling the drain after round 3. I’m having $5 on the Wanderers to win (at $1.85)

Wellington v Newcastle


As usual, the Phoenix are proving to be the surprise package of this years competition with their gallant performances against both Brisbane and the Wanderers. While Newcastle (along with Perth) took my jibe at the Melbourne derby being the most boring game of all time as a challenge and produced some form of footballing chloroform. I’m going for the full time/half time double for the Phoenix (at $3.00)

Perth v Heart


I think both of these teams are adequately adequate. They are both fairly dull, and I don’t really have much to say about them. Given that of the 10 matches played so far there have been 6 draws, I’m going to have to put my last dollar on a dull Draw in this one (at $3.40)

Ledger currently sitting at -$24.30

Gamble Responsibly


Phew, got through the article without a Kalac joke.

Angelos and the Socceroos

With Ange Postecoglou becoming the new national team coach, my buddy Richard and I engaged in one of our regular email conversations about what his biggest challenges are going to be and what Socceroos fans should be expecting in the next few years from our new foreign coach.

The result is below – 


RICHARD: What are your thoughts on Postecoglou getting the job?

ME: He’s definitely the guy to take over long term, and needs to have FULL control of everything and a big say in how our national youth teams are taught to play etc etc.

But I do have concerns that his style of play is the type of thing that is taught over a length of time while working, day in, day out with players.

If you have an ever changing squad and only a couple of days every other month to work with them, can you really implement anything?

RICH: Yeah, it’s definitely worlds apart, isn’t it, club coaching and international coaching. Probably a large reason why guys like Ferguson and Wenger, despite all their their successes, have never stepped into the realm of international coaching. 

I like the idea of Postecoglou as well and agree that he needs full control of how the team (at multiple levels) is run, and needs to have the full confidence and backing of the FFA, through teething problems and all. Would be happy to see him wield the axe and blood some new talent. We really should have been ushering in a new school of talent after that 2011 Asian Cup. Guys like Rogic, Kruse and Ryan are clearly the future now. 

ME: Yeah, the reason I like it, is that he’s shown in the past that he is willing to drop or sack players that can’t fit his system.

When he went to the Roar and just wiped out all of the Old Boys from Rangers etc and lost for a while he stayed confident in his plans and was proven right.

He went to the Victory and let Hernandez go because he was lazy, and he was right.

I have no doubt that ADP – as good as he is – would actually be struggling to start if Ange were in charge at Sydney. Doesn’t defend enough.

I think we’ve definitely seen the last of Neill and some of the old guard.

We’ll also see Mark Milligan be one of the first picked in every squad, because he understands how to play Ange’s style.

We may also see a much higher A-League representation in the side – particularly guys that have been fringe players in the past but Ange has coached before and would take less time to pick up his style again…

RICH: Schwarzer would be on the chopping block as well. The way I see it, if he just wants to sit on the bench at Chelsea, he can deal with the consequences, particularly when Mat Ryan is starting for Bruges and getting plenty of game time.

I see Milligan as being a major cog in the Postecoglou Socceroos as well.

Like yourself, I’ll be the first to defend to the viability and importance of the A-League when it’s shat upon by Euroleague snobs, but I sense that Milligan playing his club football in Australia could be a setback (ever so minor) for him. I understand that playing in the A-League is just as good if not better than playing in second-tier European leagues, the Middle East and most of Asia, but I sense that if he’d been playing first team football for a decent enough European club for the past year or two, there’d be virtually no debate about him even being picked as new Socceroos captain.

That being said, having played in Melbourne in the past two seasons (give or take) shouldn’t diminish his chances at the armband – he’s the right age, in career best form, has demonstrated immense leadership abilities since joining Victory and plays a really important role.

ME: I think the biggest issue for him is that the only Australian player starting in the EPL (Mile Jedinak) also plays his exact same position. Additionally, he is the Captain of said EPL team, not just another cog in the machine, so unless we have 2 DM’s (which I doubt we will) then I don’t know how that is going to go.

Schwarzer was out of the last squad and Langerak is playing Champions League football. I kind of thought he wasn’t going to start in Brazil anyway, but I don’t think he’ll even go now.

I think that Bresciano may be the main older player that stays in the squad, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was handed the armband for the World Cup.

Oh and Tim Cahill will still be there too, but I think the others will be VERY nervous…

RICH: On Jedinak – see, that’s exactly what Milligan would have needed to make it a virtual lock for the Socceroos captaincy! I guess what makes it more ironic is that he was linked to Jedinak’s club in the off-season. Even if Milligan was in Belgium, France or The Netherlands, for instance, his captaincy stock would be way higher. Despite him turning out in Victory colours, I’m a big fan of how he’s playing. Just seems to have taken an enormous leap since he returned to Australia.

Mate, if you ask me, Australia’s Brazil keepers will be  Ryan and Langerak (their club form will dictate who gets first nod) and Galekovic as third choice (for similar reasons to Milligan – right age, career best form, great leadership abilities and respected by coach and teammates, etc). In light of that, Ryan playing in Europe and, as you point out, Langerak playing UCL football, I’d say Schwarzer’s done for.

Agree that Cahill and Bresciano are the only ones from the old guard who would be worthy of their spots in the squad. Have also read that Bresciano will most likely get the captaincy for Brazil, but I imagine that his international career won’t go further than the 2015 Asian Cup, at which point, a medium-long term captain should be installed if not before that tournament.

ME: I see what you’re saying with the European pedigree for Milligan, but I don’t think that’ll matter to Ange.

To another coach maybe…

That said, I don’t think Milligan will even be considered as captain to be honest, but I think he’ll definitely play a lot.

I think we’ll get an older head such as Bresciano for Captain at the World Cup and POSSIBLY Asian Cup, and the long term captain will reveal himself in that period.

That may be Milligan, it may be someone else, but I think it’s too early to make that call…

RICH: Milligan will definitely get plenty of first team action under Ange, though if there will only be one DM, I assume Milligan would have to fall back into central defence (presumably replacing Neill if he’s axed) to make way for Jedinak?

And yeah, a wait-and-see approach will definitely be most effective to anoint a new long-term captain based on how Australia fares over the next 12-18 months.

ME: Well he already played the big games of qualification against Japan and the final match where we got through to Brazil.

His opportunity came due to a niggle for Jedinak, but even Holger saw enough in him to keep him in the side once Jedinak recovered.

So his current club coach, who thinks the world of him, and has kind of build his teams structure around him and made him the captain for this season?

I think Jedinak may be the one that has to move positions…? Maybe as a stop gap defender, maybe a little further up the park? Depends on the formation.

But that’s just it, Ange won’t have the luxury of bringing in foreign players that suit his style. He is limited in who he has at his disposal.

If Australia doesn’t have the strikers that he needs (and he clearly doesn’t seem to think we do given his history of foreign forwards at club level) what does that mean for his game plan?

He isn’t a single minded coach who only has one way to do things – he’s shown a willingness to change up his formations – but the same style is always there.

Will be an interesting time, that’s for sure.


RICH: We’ve been found wanting up front ever since Viduka faded into obscurity – even then, he never fully fired on all cylinders when he played for Australia. No one since then has really taken their chances – McDonald, Kennedy, Brosque, Thompson et al.

We’ve obviously resorted to using him as a striker before, but the way Cahill is banging them in over in the MLS (12 goals in 37 games), I’d say he’s possibly our most experienced and reliable option up front?

It’s funny because we’ve got some genuinely talented and creative players (Rogic and Kruse), some really good young keepers (Langerak and Ryan), some decent wide options albeit “fringe” players (Nicholls, Oar, Zullo) and some very reliable defensive midfielders (Milligan, Jedinak) but then there are gaping holes in our defence and the lack of any firepower up front.

Definitely interesting times ahead!

ME: At least we won’t lose the game in the middle of the park!

The thing is, we actually have guys that are scoring goals for fun in European leagues right now (Matthew Leckie, Dario Vidosic, Robbie Kruse, Oliver Bozanic) but none of them are out and out strikers.

They’re wide forwards, or Attacking Mid’s or at best you might call Leckie a “Second Striker” but no real out and out strikers.

Now, Scott McDonald has never scored for Australia and may very well have a line through his name, but I think he’s probably the closest we have to a Berisha/Smeltz type to suit Ange’s style.

Outside of that we have Josh Kennedy and I REALLY don’t want us to play Cahill up front. It’s such a waste. However, he doesn’t really fit the AM mould that Ange goes for, and PLENTY of other players do…

I think a lot of these Socceroos that have been given assurances about playing in Petrol leagues and it not making a difference to their World Cup ambition will be pretty unhappy right now.

For the first time in a very long time I’ll be curious to see who is named in the next Socceroo squad…

RICH: Same, I don’t want to see Cahill used as a striker either but his goal-scoring, even if in the MLS, will be hard to ignore if he keeps it up.

Ideally, I’d really like to see an instinctive finisher up front – someone who knows how to position himself and put the ball in the back of the net, in the mould of Smeltz/Berisha or, if we’re to use more glamorous examples, Van Nistelrooy, Klose, Shevchenko, Owen or Inzaghi (at the peak of their careers obviously).

I think Scott McDonald’s opportunity has come and gone. Not playing in the UCL anymore won’t help either.

With some friendlies slated for next month potentially against England and Ireland, I’ll actually be inclined to watch the match to see who’ll turn out for the Socceroos. 

ME: Yeah, I agree with the idea that his time has come and gone for the Socceroos, and he’s not playing at the top level, but he is still in the Championship – which is rated as highly as all the second tier European leagues.

But the only reason I even bring him up, is because he’s the closest thing we’ve got to a pure finisher. His outstanding run of goals at Celtic was only a couple of years ago, and I’ll be surprised if Ange isn’t at least considering him.

He has had the problem throughout his Socceroos career of being employed as a sole striker in a 4-5-1, which simply put is a terrible idea for a poacher who is 5’8” – so I don’t totally blame him for his national team duck.

On the other had we have Josh Kennedy who is a good plan B, but under Ange, he is really not agile enough to play at striker.

Nikita Rukavytsya has played at striker and is pacy, but is not a great finisher – kind of the biggest thing we need there – so is more likely to get a run as a winger

Outside of that, all of our strikers not playing in Asia are 22 or under and frankly, nowhere near ready.

There is one final possibility though. The Great Uraguayan* Myth. Richard Porta.

Maybe he can fit the bill. Only I don’t think anyone has actually seen him play.


*I hope you know the correct way to pronounce that word – You-Rag-We-An.

RICH: Yeah, I think McDonald was a victim of circumstance during the Pim years – tactics and formations worked against him and, as you say, being his size in a 4-5-1 is a pretty thankless job. He’s 30 years old now and even if he gets another chance, it really shouldn’t stop us from blooding someone (anyone!) for the long term as I can’t imagine McDonald being seriously considered for any tournaments beyond the 2015 Asian Cup.

Where’s Rukavytsya these days? Smaller Bundesliga club or something? Great pace, but always thought his finishing and touch needed some work.

ME: Yeah he’s bounced around Europe a little, without ever REALLY cracking a permanent first team spot.

Had a decent run at Hertha Berlin playing 50 odd games over the space of a few seasons, but ultimately finished with 5 goals.

If his finishing was a bit more clinical I’d be all for him having first crack up front in that general Ange system, but ultimately we are REALLY low on striking stocks and I think it’ll be his first big issue to deal with.

The Defence is also an issue, but there are young players that could take up a strong role if given an opportunity, and up front we don’t have that luxury.

I just realised, that this brings Archie Thompson back into frame.


RICH: Yeah, I alluded to Thompson a few emails back when I was lamenting the lack of strikers in the post-Viduka era. He’s shown some solid form in the A-League over the past two seasons despite his advancing years, but whether this can readily and meaningfully be translated into the international arena is a completely different story. Ultimately, most competitive games Australia plays now will be against other AFC nations – obviously for qualifying campaigns, etc – but you have to ask whether he can cut the mustard at World Cup level when we’re going up against the likes of Argentina, Spain or seeded powerhouses like Belgium and Switzerland.

I know there’s been a lot of chopping and changing in the defence over the past few years, but assuming Ange wields the axe and Neill goes, what’s likely to be our strongest back four? (Didn’t really follow Socceroo fortunes that closely during the Osieck era)

ME: Well Ange needs Defenders that can pass, and I don’t really think anyone has asked any of our defenders to do that for quite a while, so I don’t really know!

I could see him playing Zullo at LB.

Curtis Good is a whisker away from playing meaningful minutes at Newcastle (in England that is) but is only 20, so you wouldn’t want to pair him with another kid

Rhys Williams is a RB come CB and is a decent passer and is 25 and currently playing Championship football…

Bailey Wright is a 21 year old Centre Back playing League One who you’d think might be worth investigating if we’re looking to the future (haven’t seen anything myself)

Shane Lowry is 24 and has bounced around some of the decent clubs in England (and Leeds)

Dylan McGowan is very popular in Scotland but I’m not entirely convinced yet

Jason Davidson is a LB come CB who’s starting in the Eredivisie (but is only 22)

Then there’s the guys in Korea like Robbie Cornthwaite, and Luke DeVere (who has worked well with Ange before)

Ognenovski is old, but didn’t hit his peak til late, so may still be considered as an experienced head

Then there’s some good defenders in the A-League that I won’t start to get into.

But I suppose you can see my point. Plenty more options there than up front.

RICH: Yeah, I suppose guys like Beauchamp and Spiranovic in the A-League are on the peripheral but are perfectly capable of making cases for themselves with some strong showings.

Forgot all about Ognenovski – no nonsense coupled with strength and height. I’m a fan. 

ME: Yeah, but the Ogmonster is also 35 years old…

Ultimately, I don’t think there is a team of Australians in the world that will make any impact whatsoever at this coming World Cup, and the Australian public needs to know that.

We need to have the right expectations heading in so that there isn’t unnecessary pressure put on Ange to get us out of the group stage or anything.

All we should really be wanting from the Socceroos in Brazil is that they show some pride in the jersey, at least look like they are trying to play some positive football, and don’t embarrass themselves.

If we go in expecting more than that, we are setting ourselves up for failure

RICH: Agree 100%.

I’ve uttered what some might consider negative, but I maintain are realistic, remarks in the kitchen at work here regarding how Australia will fare in Brazil and people were saying that I wasn’t being fair on the team – part-time followers of the game who clearly know nothing. We’re kidding ourselves if we think we’re going there to do anything than make up the numbers unless a very, very kind first round draw is given to us and we play out of our skins.

I think casual followers of the sport have this mindset of “We got out of the group stage in 2006, why can’t we do it again?!” without realising that that will soon be 8 years ago – a massive period in footballing terms – and the core of that squad is now either retired or just over the hill.

As you say, it’s all about tempering public expectation. Ange must not be put to the sword if we don’t get out of the group stage – as I highlighted yesterday, he really needs the full backing, confidence and patience of the FFA as clearly what his appointment is aimed at is implementing a medium to long-term plan.

And, yeah, Sasa made his international debut very late in the game, didn’t he? At 30-31 years old or something?

Became a bit of a revelation after he won the ACL with his Korean club and was named AFC Player of the Year or something?


ME: I would assume that Ange being the headstrong person that he is would have been very specific with his contract and what is expected of him.

Though he did REALLY want the job so may have had to make certain concessions to ensure he got it I suppose…

And yeah Sasa didn’t get his first cap til he was 31. So he may not be as burnt out. But the thing is, if you’re going into the a World Cup with Ogmonster as your senior, most experienced defender and leader at the back, you can’t really expect to win much of anything.

It’s too big of a tournament to just write off by throwing all kids in there and getting them experience, but at the same time we have to be seen to be making forward strides…

It’s going to be a tough balancing act…

RICH: Yeah, I’m really of that mindset that after the back to back 6-0 results, we really have reached the depths and there’s really nothing to lose from here such that I’d welcome some major experimentation from Ange.

This will be Australia’s third consecutive World Cup, but if you look at the case of teams like South Korea and USA when they were in a similar situation back in the 1990s, they’d also qualified for consecutive editions of the tournament but were plain and clearly just whipping boys, but through gradual development, they’re no longer just glanced over as 3 easy points for first round opponents but are genuine contenders to get out of their group these days.

We might have to have a lacklustre campaign in Brazil, but I think the experience gained by younger players, if they’re given the chance there, will be invaluable come 2018 and beyond.

ME: The thing is, I want him to experiment in up-coming friendlies, try a few things out, take a look at some different players, get a camp together leading up to the World Cup and then select the strongest available squad – that suits what he wants to do – and take them to Brazil.

If Lucas Neill and co somehow manage to be a part of that squad, then so be it.

But I can guarantee that there will be several players in that same squad that will benefit from the experience and will then be in a better position for us to have a real go at the Asian Cup on home soil, along with some even fresher blood that may not be ready yet but will be by then.

I just don’t think that we need to throw away this World Cup to do so.

We’ve made three in a row now, and people are starting to act like the Uruguayan’s in thinking it’s our divine right to be there.

If this ends up being our last World Cup for 8 to 12 years, would you still want us flushing it?

I know I wouldn’t.

RICH: Yeah, good point you make about the possibility of not qualifying for future world cups. While our most recent qualification campaign would hardly suggest it, I think we’ll continue to be one of the stronger teams in the AFC going into the future such that we’ll always have a reasonable chance of qualifying, but certainly it’s no grounds for assuming it as a given as more casual supporters tend to do in the post-2006 era.

Only need to look at the epic fall from grace of teams like Hungary and Russia/Soviet Union who used to be powerhouses and are now second-tier nations at best.

Also, alluding back to our conversation yesterday about the need for a Berisha/Smeltz-type finisher? Turns out that Smeltz is actually a dual Australian-NZ citizen and undoubtedly chose to put his hand up for NZ instead, assuming that in the Viduka era that he didn’t have a chance in hell of playing for the Socceroos. His international goal tally is actually quite healthy as well with 23 goals in 48 matches for the All Whites. He’d be a handy option now if he were still eligible for Australian selection!


Yeah, Qualifying, even through Asia, is still an achievement in and of itself for a nation of our standing. As it is, we are the lowest ranked nation to have qualified for Brazil I think…

On Smeltz, there are a couple of factors that rule him out. The first is that he made his NZ debut before he gained Australian Citizenship, so even if we didn’t have Viduka he would have been ruled out. And secondly, people forget that before he returned to NZ to play for the Phoenix, he was considered an overwhelmingly average footballer. He was coming off a season at Halifax Town, who were playing non-league football, where he scored 2 goals in 31 games. Until he hit that rich vein of form that is carrying through to today, he would never have been considered for Australia regardless. He was considered for NZ though, because, well, who else were they going to pick?

But in summary, I think it’s fair to say that the biggest challenges for Angelos heading into his new job are, in order –

1. Who will play up front?

2. Is he going to have enough time to implement any sort of style of football on these players?

3. What will the back 4 look like?

4. Does he throw the kids in for the World Cup to gain experience and go for the Asian Cup trophy, or does he go for the best possible result he can get at the World Cup (and are those things mutually exclusive)?

Anything to add or change there?


Yeah, hindsight 20-20 with Smeltz but if he were available, considering Archie’s getting a run, I’d say Smeltz would have earnt a handful of caps in Asian qualifiers over the past few years at the very least based on his A-League form. He’s older than I thought as well (early 30s; I thought he was mid-late 20s?)

I guess the other talking point was who gets the captain’s armband under our new foreign coach (he was born in Athens)?

ME: Yeah, forgot about the captain thing. Definitely at number 5 on the issue list for mine though.

Might have to pick this up again in 12 months time to see how he handled each of those issues and give him a mark out of ten for each…?
RICH: Sounds like a plan

A League Picks – Round 2

We’ll start off with a quick assessment of just how far off I was with most of my bets last week. I said Sydney would get thoroughly dominated, so of course, they had a convincing win. I said Santalab would be the first goal scorer for the Wanderers this season, so of course, he didn’t even start the match. I said that the biggest weaknesses of both the Melbourne sides was their defence, so of course they had a 0-0 draw. I said Wellington were awful and Brisbane would dominate both halves. So of course, they needed a late winner to seal the match. But the one ray of light at the end of my abysmal betting weekend was the triumph of Adelaide United with passing slicker than Zeljko Kalac’s hair*

So the bad news is, only one of my bets came through. The good news is, I miscalculated and didn’t spend my full $10, so I have extra money to bet this week!

So with the accidental $9 spend last week and the $2.30 win, the current ledger is sitting at -$6.70. Yay me.

Now, on to this week’s bets.

Adelaide v Victory


These “traditional rivals” couldn’t be coming off more disparate performances. Adelaide looked brilliant, exciting and full of energy while the Victory looked lost, dull and half dead. That said, I definitely don’t expect a blow out here. The Reds are playing at home and I think that might be enough to give them the edge. I’m going to hedge my bets here and have a dollar on the draw (at $3.40) and a dollar on Adelaide to win by 1 goal (at $3.75)

Heart v Mariners


Both teams here opened their accounts with a draw and neither gave too much away about how they would play this season. The Heart played in the most boring game of the round** and the Mariners were cagey, careful not to give too much away against last season’s Grand Final opponents. I like the Mariners here, but my actual $2 bet is going on a draw at half time into a Central Coast win at Full Time (at $4.50)

Roar v Sydney


For the first time in many years, Sydney actually looked like they had a clear game plan other than to hang on for dear life and hope for the best. They only got a marginal pass mark in completing that game plan, but it’s a start. The Roar on the other hand turned their blistering pre-season form into a confused mess that Lindsay Lohan would be proud of. But the lure of historical dominance is very strong here. Sydney haven’t beaten Brisbane in Brisbane since the last time Kevin Rudd actually won an election. No matter the form, the Roar always have the wood on Sydney when they play at Lang Park. On top of that, a Sydney win here would mean that they would start a season with 2 consecutive wins, something they’ve only done once in their history (the year they won the double) so the money here is going to have to be 2 dollars on Brisbane to win by 1 goal (at $3.50) and a one dollar insurance bet on a draw (at $3.85)

Jets v Glory


The Jets would need a colossal turn around in form after being dominated by an average Sydney team last week. Their attack was a shambles and the smart money would say that they are unlikely to fix that in a week. But I don’t have smart money. Also, Perth conceded the most goals of any team last week, so there are a lot of variables. I’m going to put two dollars on a straight Perth win (at $2.75)

WSW v Phoenix


Against the Mariners, Western Sydney looked a little bit like they still hadn’t mentally gotten over the Grand Final loss. With a very similar squad to last season, the mental scars are still there. However, playing against the Phoenix in Australia is a different prospect altogether. In front of the inventors of atmosphere, the RBB, and what really should be a sell-out crowd given the membership numbers, I expect this to be a walk in the park for Western Sydney’s finest. I’m going with two dollars on the Wanderers to win by 2 goals or more (at $2.00)


So the ledger heading into the weekend is now at -$17.70. Hopefully I can make up some ground from last week.

Gamble Responsibly



*I’ve really got to stop targeting Spider. He’s a monster of a human and could eat me for breakfast. Sorry champ 🙂

**And possibly the history of time

A League Picks – Round 1


I want to start this by saying that I’m not much of a gambler.
I don’t play the pokies, I don’t bet on horses unless it’s Melbourne Cup Day and my few forays into sports gambling have been average at best.

That said, I’m starting something here as a bit of an experiment to see how much money I would win* if I had $10 to bet each week on the 5 A-League games.

I can use that money however I see fit, that is it doesn’t have to mean a $2 bet on each game, but I’m using the idea of a minimum bet of $1 and I have to place some sort of bet on every game.

I’ll be using the TAB market at the time that I look it up – which will be as I write it**

The caveat is that if*** my total kitty at the end of a weekend is under $50, I lose and the game finishes.

So getting on with it –



There’s no point messing around here, either the TAB knows something I don’t or they’ve got Zeljko Kalac setting the odds. In spite of encouraging home form last season, Sydney FC have been inconceivably awful during pre-season, and that was before Anthony Crea inflicted the team with an injury list that would make Harry Kewell blush

I’m putting $4 on Newcastle to win (at $3.85) and $1 on the draw (at $3.40) in case an actual confirmed miracle happens and we concede less than 2 goals.



I truly have no idea what is going to happen here, but I do have a feeling that after embarrassing themselves in the first free to air A-League game of the year, Sydney are going to have some salt rubbed in their wound when former Sydney nobody Brendan Santalab scores, so I’ll put a dollar in him to be first goal scorer (at $8.50)



After a full off season to rub his smarmy faced style all over the Victory players faces, I think they’ll be a decent side this year, but their biggest weakness is still going to be their defence. On top of that, Heart lost their marquee defender and look to be still getting used to each other on the park, which is going to make for at least 4 goals in this game for mine. So I’m going for $1 on the Over 3.5 Goals to be scored in this match (at $2.80)



The Roar have been on fire this pre-season, scoring goals at will, while Wellington literally signed 4 players just this week. I’m actually not kidding at all. 4 players. This week. I’m going for Brisbane in the Half/Full Time double (at $3.85)



I’ve not seen or heard much at all about Perth this off season, but for the first time in a long time, they appear to be going into a season with a manager that has seen a football before in his life. But on the other hand I’ve heard nothing but positive reviews of Adelaide under their new coach. So my final dollar will go on Adelaide to win (at $2.30)

Which leaves my current ledger at -$10.00

Gamble responsibly.




*That is, how much money I will almost certainly lose

**I know, TAB has terrible odds, IDGAF, it’s what I’m using.

***read; once